Thursday, April 2, 2015

a bad resolution

Ministerial and sacramental fraud, by which I mean the public teaching of the Gospel and administration of the Sacraments on the part of those not called to do so, is a great cause for concern in today's church.  If there were only one known case of it, it would be a scandal, and would merit immediate action on the part of the greater church.  The fact is, however, that it has slithered its way into the bloodstream of modern American Missouri Synod Lutheranism. It is rampant. Everyone knows it. Opinions merely differ on the degree to which it is a bad thing, and what to do about it.

I applaud those who are striving to combat the problem.  However, not every effort to that end is worthy of the Church.  One effort I would highlight is a resolution which the Northern Illinois District of the LC-MS passed a few weeks ago.

The text of the resolution can be found here, and reads as follows:


The 58th Convention of The Northern Illinois District of The Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod 40 March 6-7, 2015
Resolution 2-12B To Address Licensed Lay Administration of Word and Sacrament

WHEREAS Article 14 of the Augsburg Confession says, “Our churches teach that no one should publicly teach in the church or administer the Sacraments, without a rightly orderedcall” (Concordia: The Lutheran Confessions: A Reader’s Edition of the Book of Concord);” and
WHEREAS in 1989 our Synod at Wichita adopted Resolution 3-05B, regularizing under particular circumstances that the following be done by men who do not hold the Office of the Public Ministry: composing and delivering sermons, leading public worship services, and administering Holy Baptism and Holy Communion (1989 Convention Proceedings, 111- 2 113); and
WHEREAS there has been tension over this issue for the past 25 years; and
WHEREAS in 2007 the Synod established the “Specific Ministry Pastor Program” in which men are trained, examined, certified, called, and ordained in order to preach the Gospel and administer the Sacraments (Res. 5-01B, 2007 Convention Proceedings, 133 ff.); and
WHEREAS this program was designed to meet the objective, among others, of providing pastoral ministry where full-time ministry cannot be maintained and does so without conflicting  with Article 14 of the Augsburg Confession; therefore be it
RESOLVED that the Northern Illinois District respectfully request the Synod to discontinue the new licensing of laymen to preach the Gospel and administer the Sacraments (1989 Res. 3- 16 05B); and be it further
RESOLVED that those who are currently licensed be encouraged to enroll in the regular or SMP track leading to ordination; and be it further
RESOLVED that those who are currently licensed but not enrolled in the regular (i.e., residential seminary) or SMP track discontinue publically preaching the Gospel and administering the sacraments within three years of the adoption of this resolution by the Synod in convention; and be it further
RESOLVED that an extension of the above deadline for those currently licensed can be granted by the appropriate District President in extreme circumstance, and that upon consultation with and the agreement of the President of the Synod; and be it finally
RESOLVED that the Northern Illinois District in convention submit this resolution as an overture to the Synod for consideration at the 2016 convention of Synod.
The following part is good, worthy, and right:

 "RESOLVED that the Northern Illinois District respectfully request the Synod to discontinue the new licensing of laymen to preach the Gospel and administer the Sacraments (1989 Res. 3- 16 05B)"

However, it is immediately followed by this:

 "and be it further
RESOLVED that those who are currently licensed be encouraged to enroll in the regular or SMP track leading to ordination"

This second "resolved" statement would have the church approve and reward violators of our Confession by welcoming them into seminary, and eventually granting them holy ordination.

Next, we have this:

"and be it further
RESOLVED that those who are currently licensed but not enrolled in the regular (i.e., residential seminary) or SMP track discontinue publically preaching the Gospel and administering the sacraments within three years of the adoption of this resolution by the Synod in convention"

This officially permits, allows, and by implication endorses these men continuing in their improper activity for three additional years. Not merely three years from now, but three years from the resolution's adoption by the Synod convention.

Next we have this:

"and be it further
RESOLVED that an extension of the above deadline for those currently licensed can be granted by the appropriate District President in extreme circumstance, and that upon consultation with and the agreement of the President of the Synod"

This one grants a bureaucratic loophole to the above three year deadline. Are there "extreme circumstances" which make lay administration of the Eucharist acceptable?  How about lay preaching?  Do we glean that from the Augustana or the Book of Concord?

Such efforts might or might not be politically and bureaucratically wise.  This resolution, however, does not square with a church that takes seriously its Confession (eg., CA XIV), and cannot be defended on Confessional grounds. It should not have passed.

4 comments:

Ella Fitz-Hywel said...

The SMP program is in itself nothing but ignorant wanna bes, I.e., ignorant, defined as Unknowledgeable , since their academic achievements under the SMP program are woefully inadequate, who have a desire to minister but not the intellectual gifts and or resolute determination to acquire them by concentrated study.

SMP is nothing other than ordained lay ministers under the rubric ' ordained ' to justify an anti- intellectual pietistic view of the office of the ministry.

They send these unprepared men as physicians of souls and what happens is in reality they end up harming or killing said souls through a false theology, theological practice.

This resolution tries to address the false practice of a dubious ministry based on Augustana 14 but uses the English translation " should not " when the Latin specifically says " shall not ". This opened the door to our present situation, through a cowardly misrepresentation.

As to the regular ministry the only good advice is, "trust but verify".



Dcn Latif Haki Gaba SSP said...

Well stated, Ella.

Most Beautiful Visiting Places In Australia said...

We are a group of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community. Your web site offered us with valuable info to work on. You have done a formidable job and our whole community will be thankful to you.

Gary said...

Are our pastors telling us the truth?

Are Christian pastors honest with their congregations regarding the evidence for the Resurrection? Is there really a "mountain of evidence" for the Resurrection as our pastors claim or is the belief in the Resurrection based on nothing more than assumptions, second century hearsay, superstitions, and giant leaps of faith?

Check out this Lutheran pastor's defense of the Resurrection and a review by one of his former parishioners who lost his faith and is now an nonbeliever primarily due to the lack of good evidence for the Resurrection:

http://www.lutherwasnotbornagain.com/2016/06/a-review-of-lcms-pastor-john-bombaros.html